• Posted on 17 Sep 2025

By James Laurenceson and Xi Chen

This article appeared in Asia & the Pacific Policy Studies, vol. 12, issue 3. https://doi.org/10.1002/app5.70047.

Abstract

The China-Australia Free Trade Agreement (ChAFTA) was signed in June 2015. Unlike other deals that Australia struck with Japan and Korea around the same time, ChAFTAʼs passage through the Australian parliament was vigorously contested. This Policy Forum begins by recounting the claims of ChAFTAʼs Australian proponents and critics. It then uses these to structure an assessment of outcomes a decade on. The weight of evidence favours ChAFTAʼs proponents. A review of Chinese perspectives on the other hand points to different metrics and a more ambiguous assessment. Nonetheless, ChAFTAʼs net benefits have been sufficient to secure ongoing governmental and broader public support.

share_windows Read the book chapter online here. (Access may require purchase or subscription).

Share

AUTHOR

James Laurenceson

Director, Australia-China Relations Institute And Professor, DVC (International & Development)

Xi Chen

Recent research and opinion

News

Australia-China weekly brief: June 2026 issues

The Australia-China Weekly Brief by the Australia-China Relations Institute at the University of Technology Sydney (UTS:ACRI) tracks key developments in...

News

PERSPECTIVES | Hanson’s new rise reopens old questions for Chinese-Australians

This article appeared in UTS:ACRI's Perspectives on June 23 2026. Perspectives is the commentary series of the Australia-China Relations Institute at the...

News

The hidden Chinese history of Australia

share_windows This article appeared in The Australian's Culture on June 20 2026.

News

The risk of collaboration with China is smaller than the cost of curbing it

National security is not strengthened by making Australia smaller and less attractive to scientific talent, say James Laurenceson and Wanning Sun.