• Posted on 17 Sep 2025

By James Laurenceson and Xi Chen

This article appeared in Asia & the Pacific Policy Studies, vol. 12, issue 3. https://doi.org/10.1002/app5.70047.

Abstract

The China-Australia Free Trade Agreement (ChAFTA) was signed in June 2015. Unlike other deals that Australia struck with Japan and Korea around the same time, ChAFTAʼs passage through the Australian parliament was vigorously contested. This Policy Forum begins by recounting the claims of ChAFTAʼs Australian proponents and critics. It then uses these to structure an assessment of outcomes a decade on. The weight of evidence favours ChAFTAʼs proponents. A review of Chinese perspectives on the other hand points to different metrics and a more ambiguous assessment. Nonetheless, ChAFTAʼs net benefits have been sufficient to secure ongoing governmental and broader public support.

share_windows Read the book chapter online here. (Access may require purchase or subscription).

Share

AUTHOR

James Laurenceson

Director, Australia-China Relations Institute And Professor, DVC (International & Development)

Xi Chen

Recent research and opinion

News

Australia’s strategic ambiguity is running out of road

Washington wants allies to spend more on defense, while Beijing judges Australia by what it does, not what it says. Canberra needs to take stock of its own...

News

Australia-China weekly brief: June 2026 issues

The Australia-China Weekly Brief by the Australia-China Relations Institute at the University of Technology Sydney (UTS:ACRI) tracks key developments in...

News

Xi’s new US-China formula signals a self-confident shift in terms

Xi-Trump summit upshot wasn’t a deal — it was a new Beijing framework defining the ‘proper limits’ of US-China rivalry.

News

UTS:ACRI webinar: Australia-China education and research ties at a crossroads

On June 3 2026, the Australia-China Relations Institute at the University of Technology Sydney (UTS:ACRI) hosted Dr Angela Lehmann, Senior Director Global...