• Posted on 25 Mar 2025

By James Laurenceson

This article was published in China International Strategy Review,  vol. 7, pp. 16–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42533-025-00177-w.

Abstract

As Great Power rivalry in the Asia–Pacific has intensified, Australia has widely come to be seen as a prototypical Balancer. By lending its modest weight in support of its long-time security ally, the US, it seeks to offset the challenges to the regional order posed by China. Developments like the AUKUS partnership struck between Australia, the US and the UK in 2021 are interpreted as confirmation of Australia’s contemporary international alignment. This paper, however, argues that post-AUKUS, Australia has not comprehensively abandoned its hedging strategy. This is reflected in a number of Canberra’s regional assessments and responses that diverge significantly from that of Washington. Similar to Beijing, Canberra believes that the era of US primacy has come to an end and the region is now multipolar. In framing a response, Canberra also broadly shares Beijing’s view that deeper economic integration not only advances domestic and regional prosperity, but also stability and security. Further conditioning Canberra’s response is a recognition that short of extreme scenarios, geopolitical “like-mindedness” counts for little in safeguarding local living standards. For China, Australia’s ongoing ambiguous alignment is a starting point for creative and professional diplomacy to unlock mutually beneficial outcomes. A second Trump administration in Washington is also likely to exacerbate the foreign policy divide between Canberra and Washington.

share_windows Read the article online here. (Access may require purchase or subscription).

Share

AUTHOR

James Laurenceson

Director, Australia-China Relations Institute And Professor, DVC (International & Development)

Recent research and opinion

News

Australia-China Weekly Brief: November 2026 issues

The Australia-China Weekly Brief by the Australia-China Relations Institute at the University of Technology Sydney (UTS:ACRI) tracks key developments in...

News

One year on, what has the Australia-US critical minerals framework delivered?

A year on, the headline US financing for Australian critical minerals projects has yet to appear publicly as signed agreements. Four steps would help Canberra...

News

Australia’s trade with China: What is too much of a good thing?

The data shows that Trade Minister Don Farrell is right – Australia can do more with China. But James Laurenceson writes that how much more depends on...

News

Can the Quad cope?

This article appeared in Toda Peace Institute's Global Outlook on November 10 2026.