• Posted on 1 Sep 2026

This week’s Centre for Media Transition newsletter is typically eclectic, ranging from legislative analysis to journalistic metamorphosis, from amusing gaffe to abhorrent material. First, Julie Eisenberg tackles the new legislation prescribing how funds from the News Bargaining Incentive are going to be distributed. Not much at stake here, other than hundred millions of dollars, the future of journalism and the Australia-US trade relationship. Next I go gonzo at the Grand Final of this year’s UTS Law Tech Challenge, where students build apps for not-for-profit clients. Spoiler alert: the announcement of the 2026 winner was not without incident. Then Chris Hall shares a dangerous provocation: that youtubers can be ethical. Seriously. And finally Susanne Llyod-Jones exlores why the e-Safety Commissioner sent Telegram a message that was not exactly bursting with heart emojis. We also detail our latest podcast, in which Derek talks to Matthew Ricketson about Rupert Murdoch. 

Read the articles here:

Share

Written by Sacha Molitorisz

Associate Professor, UTS Law

News

Getting Murdoched

For the CMT Podcast DoubleTake, CMT Co-Director Derek Wilding talks to Matthew Ricketson about his latest book, co-authored with Andrew Dodd - Getting...

News

And the winner is ... social justice. And confusion

Sacha Molitorisz looks at the Grand Final of this year’s UTS Law Tech Challenge, where students build apps for not-for-profit clients

News

Understanding the News Bargaining Incentive's distribution model

Julie Eisenberg tackles the new legislation prescribing how funds from the News Bargaining Incentive are going to be distributed.

News

The serious standards of serious youtubers

Chris Hall shared a provocation on a Raw Ethics Panel at the Festival of dangerous ideas: that youtubers can be ethical.