- Posted on 16 Mar 2026
- 4-min-minute read
The transition to 100% renewable energy is not without its difficulties – not least increased demand for critical minerals.
A new UTS Institute for Sustainable Futures (ISF) report shows how this demand might be minimised to lessen the negative environmental and social impacts of mining.
Renewable energy technology is essential to the world’s mission to keep global temperature rise under 1.5°C in accordance with the Paris Agreement. While it presents an enormously positive opportunity to decarbonise, renewable tech’s reliance on minerals such as cobalt, copper and rare earths raises other sustainability concerns.
In collaboration with Greenpeace International, ISF researchers have been working to find ways to reduce mineral demand for renewables in the context of a fast-moving global energy transition.
The report Beyond Extraction: Pathways for a 1.5°C-aligned Energy Transition with Less Minerals builds on previous ISF research into future mineral demand, responsible sourcing, and available supplies in a renewable energy future.
The report finds that a clean energy transformation across energy, transport and technology systems can be achieved without sacrificing vital ecosystems to expanded terrestrial or deep‑sea mining, challenging the idea that large‑scale environmental destruction is an unavoidable cost of the energy transition.
For this report, ISF researchers updated their mineral demand predictions by considering technological advancements in renewable tech and possible demand-reduction strategies, such as recycling.
They went on to use the One Earth Climate Model tool to develop three possible future scenarios (to 2050):
- The OECM Net Zero scenario – the base energy assessment with ambitious energy efficiency and 100% renewables
- Progressive Scenario – that shows the mineral requirements with transport modal shifts, smaller cars and batteries, battery chemistry shifts, and a higher rate of mineral recycling
- Progressive Accelerated Sodium-ion Battery Scenario – based on the Progressive Scenario with a drastic increase in Na-ion battery technology use.
Realising this potential, however, requires responsible political leadership and decisive action today.
ISF’s report compares the three scenarios to each other and to scenarios published by the International Energy Agency (IEA) in the Global Critical Mineral Outlook 2025 report.
While the researchers acknowledge differences in modelling approaches, the overall trajectory of mineral demand is similar across scenarios. The comparison also showed that the Progressive Scenarios – with recycling – resulted in the least new minerals being required.
ISF Research Director and report author Professor Sven Teske said, "This research highlights how sound policies and innovative technologies can limit mineral demand in a 1.5°C-aligned energy transition. Realising this potential, however, requires responsible political leadership and decisive action today."
The report also includes five recommendations for reducing the energy transition’s mineral demand.
Five steps to a less mining-intensive transition
- reduce mineral demand through investment and delivery of shared mobility systems like improved public transport and smaller, more efficient cars
- incentivise battery technology substitution towards alternatives requiring less lithium, cobalt, or nickel
- design for circularity and scale up recycling
- prioritise mineral use for essential energy transition needs
- protect key 'Restricted Areas' from mining development.
Access all research outputs here:
download Beyond Extraction Pathways for a 1.5°C-aligned Energy Transition with Less Minerals (Report)
download Results Beyond Extraction (data download)
download Global Restricted Areas Map
