- Posted on 22 Oct 2025
As part of Law, Tech and Social Justice Week, UTS hosted a panel on Thursday 11 September exploring the challenges and opportunities of regulating new technology in a rapidly shifting global environment. Moderated by Associate Professor Evana Wright, the discussion brought together voices from law, policy, business, and the arts: Raymond Sun (Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer), Dr Miah Hammond-Errey (Strat Futures), Sarah Sacher (Human Technology Institute, UTS), and Louise Buckingham (Arts Law Centre of Australia). The heart of the debate brought into light the central question: Can Australia be courageous in regulating technology while navigating international uncertainty and constant change?
Culture at the Core of Regulation
Raymond Sun argued that culture must drive Australia’s approach to AI and tech regulation. Pointing to Japan’s success in aligning rules with cultural norms, he emphasised that Australia’s strong pro-consumer culture should guide the development of laws that reflect community values rather than imported models. “If we understand cultural drivers, we can frame regulation in ways that are both practical and enforceable,” he said.
Enforcement and Ecosystems
Dr Miah Hammond-Errey reminded the audience that “technology is not born into a lawless world — it’s about enforcement.” She highlighted the need to confront present harms such as data privacy, domestic violence, and cybersecurity, rather than deferring regulation to an imagined future. With power concentrated in the hands of a few global players, she argued that meaningful reform of privacy laws is essential to protect communities and rebalance control.
Human Rights and Productivity
Sarah Sacher criticised what she called Australia’s “passive approach” to AI regulation, warning against over-reliance on European frameworks. Instead, she urged for a clear regulatory objective grounded in human rights, combined with practical enforcement tools. She also questioned whether the Productivity Commission’s emphasis on economic benefits risks sidelining protections against harm.
Protecting Creators’ Rights
For Louise Buckingham, the debate over technology and innovation must not come at the expense of creators. She emphasised the ongoing mass infringement of copyright and moral rights, calling it “deeply problematic for cultures as we all benefit from arts and creators.” Buckingham urged stronger protections and fair compensation, highlighting the need to include First Nations cultural and intellectual property in future reforms.
Shared Vision
Despite their different perspectives, all panellists agreed on one point: technology cannot be regulated in isolation. Inclusion of diverse voices, cultural awareness, and collaboration across sectors are essential if Australia is to set a global example in ethical tech regulation.
This is the third consecutive year that the Law Faculty has successfully offered Tech and Social Justice Week, and the panel event is a firm favourite for external guests, alumni, students and staff.
Written by Mia Porter
Law and Communications Intern
