• Posted on 28 Oct 2025

HTI’s latest AI Governance Snapshot outlines the foundational questions for organisations designing AI governance structures.

As organisations increasingly embrace AI technologies, many are grappling with how to govern this transformative technology. Central questions for many organisations are how to create or adapt governance structures to provide effective AI oversight, and where authority for AI governance should reside.

AI governance structures are the formal mechanisms through which oversight of AI is exercised in an organisation. They define decision-making processes, establish clear lines of responsibility and accountability, and create reporting and escalation pathways. By providing such guardrails, they give teams the confidence to safely innovate and can directly drive business value. 

Governance structures can take many forms and be given varying degrees of authority. For larger organisations, a common approach is often the creation of a centralised, dedicated AI governance body which consolidates cross-functional expertise in the organisation.

HTI’s AI Governance Snapshot, Designing AI Governance Structures, provides guidance on two key questions for organisations to consider when designing governance structures to manage AI systems.

Foundational questions for AI governance structures: 

  1. Form of structure: Should your organisation establish a new, dedicated AI governance structure, or adapt existing structures to include AI oversight?
  2. Location of authority: Should AI governance authority be centralised, decentralised, or hybrid?

As organisations increasingly look to AI for productivity and other benefits, those that successfully leverage AI governance structures will be better placed to manage AI’s risks and capture these opportunities.

“We’ve reached an inflection point when it comes to AI governance. Effective AI governance structures are no longer a nice-to-have. Standards and regulators have made it clear that organisations should assign accountability and have clear decision-making processes for AI systems. That is exactly how AI governance structures can help organisations.”


- Nicholas Davis, Co-Director of HTI

 

Related news

News

The National AI Plan doesn’t just set a vision; it commits the Government to action. Success will be judged on how quickly the Government fulfils its commitments.

News

What the Pacific can teach us about effective regional AI policymaking

News

HTI’s submission, in response to the Productivity Commission’s Interim Report, Harnessing data and digital technology, proposes that Australia adopt a balanced approach to regulation for AI, aligning with Australian values and community expectations. Our key proposals are set out below.

News

The Human Technology Institute (HTI) publishes a new report capturing the achievements and lessons of its AI Corporate Governance Program (AICGP) over the past three years.