Skip to main content

Site navigation

  • University of Technology Sydney home
  • Home

    Home
  • For students

  • For industry

  • Research

Explore

  • Courses
  • Events
  • News
  • Stories
  • People

For you

  • Libraryarrow_right_alt
  • Staffarrow_right_alt
  • Alumniarrow_right_alt
  • Current studentsarrow_right_alt
  • Study at UTS

    • arrow_right_alt Find a course
    • arrow_right_alt Course areas
    • arrow_right_alt Undergraduate students
    • arrow_right_alt Postgraduate students
    • arrow_right_alt Research Masters and PhD
    • arrow_right_alt Online study and short courses
  • Student information

    • arrow_right_alt Current students
    • arrow_right_alt New UTS students
    • arrow_right_alt Graduates (Alumni)
    • arrow_right_alt High school students
    • arrow_right_alt Indigenous students
    • arrow_right_alt International students
  • Admissions

    • arrow_right_alt How to apply
    • arrow_right_alt Entry pathways
    • arrow_right_alt Eligibility
arrow_right_altVisit our hub for students

For you

  • Libraryarrow_right_alt
  • Staffarrow_right_alt
  • Alumniarrow_right_alt
  • Current studentsarrow_right_alt

POPULAR LINKS

  • Apply for a coursearrow_right_alt
  • Current studentsarrow_right_alt
  • Scholarshipsarrow_right_alt
  • Featured industries

    • arrow_right_alt Agriculture and food
    • arrow_right_alt Defence and space
    • arrow_right_alt Energy and transport
    • arrow_right_alt Government and policy
    • arrow_right_alt Health and medical
    • arrow_right_alt Corporate training
  • Explore

    • arrow_right_alt Tech Central
    • arrow_right_alt Case studies
    • arrow_right_alt Research
arrow_right_altVisit our hub for industry

For you

  • Libraryarrow_right_alt
  • Staffarrow_right_alt
  • Alumniarrow_right_alt
  • Current studentsarrow_right_alt

POPULAR LINKS

  • Find a UTS expertarrow_right_alt
  • Partner with usarrow_right_alt
  • Explore

    • arrow_right_alt Explore our research
    • arrow_right_alt Research centres and institutes
    • arrow_right_alt Graduate research
    • arrow_right_alt Research partnerships
arrow_right_altVisit our hub for research

For you

  • Libraryarrow_right_alt
  • Staffarrow_right_alt
  • Alumniarrow_right_alt
  • Current studentsarrow_right_alt

POPULAR LINKS

  • Find a UTS expertarrow_right_alt
  • Research centres and institutesarrow_right_alt
  • University of Technology Sydney home
Explore the University of Technology Sydney
Category Filters:
University of Technology Sydney home University of Technology Sydney home
  1. home
  2. arrow_forward_ios ... Newsroom
  3. arrow_forward_ios ... 2025
  4. arrow_forward_ios 02
  5. arrow_forward_ios Blowing in the wind

Blowing in the wind

13 February 2025
A figure caped faces a horizon, information flying like strewn papers

How to deal with online misinformation is one of the most fraught problems we face in contemporary media. Australia knows this all too well from the debate that surrounded the government’s failed attempt to introduce the Combatting Misinformation and Disinformation Bill last year. Any attempt to regulate misinformation must contend with the need to protect freedom of expression, but it must also contend with the fact that digital platforms themselves restrict freedom of expression through their own content-moderation policies, and often do so in a way that lacks transparency and consistency.

With its stronger constitutional protections for free speech, the US has never seriously considered regulation to address misinformation. But constitutional protections don’t apply to private companies, which under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act have the discretion to impose content policies as they see fit. This should mean that these policies are, at least in principle, protected from political influence. But Meta’s announcement in January of changes to its content policies – including that it would abandon its fact-checking program in the US – shows that discretion can easily sway with the political wind. In a statement on the changes, Mark Zuckerberg said that the US election result signalled a ‘cultural tipping point towards once again prioritising free speech’. This is reinforced by the fact – sometimes missed in coverage of the announcement – that the changes apply, at least so far, only in the US.

Critically, the fact-checking program, instated shortly after the 2016 US election, operates at arms-length from Meta’s platforms, with decisions about misinformation devolved to independent organisations certified by the International Fact-Checking Network (IFCN). In this way, Meta effectively transfers its discretion to fact-checkers and avoids being the arbiter of truth. Fact-checkers use journalistic verification techniques, including expert consultation, to arrive at their decisions. This connection with journalism and reliance on experts distinguishes it from crowd-sourced moderation such as community notes, which Meta will move to in the US in lieu of the fact-checking program. It also exposes fact-checking to perceptions and allegations of elite-driven bias. This may undermine both the effectiveness and legitimacy of expert fact-checking as a content-moderation tool, whether the bias is real or not.

In 2020, Meta further devolved its power over content with the creation of the Oversight Board. The Oversight Board is an independent body which considers escalated appeals on critical matters and makes policy recommendations to Meta. The board is managed by a trust and financed by an endowment from Meta. Since its inception, the board has overturned Meta’s decision in 78% of cases that it has taken on, and its recommendations have driven Meta towards greater transparency and consistency in its policies and decision-making.

Interestingly, its explicit commitment to human rights principles has often seen the board promoting greater protection of free expression than Meta’s own policies and decisions, particularly in the area of political discourse. Indeed, shortly after Meta’s announcement that it would abandon fact-checking in the US, the board issued a statement which, although circumspect, welcomed the decision and echoed Zuckerberg’s concerns about perceptions of political bias.

The potential for the apprehension of bias means moderating online content will always be difficult. But independence from both government and unchecked platform discretion is critical. The Oversight Board provides this independence, but there is nothing standing in the way of Meta abandoning that project as well, at least in the US. In the EU, by contrast, the winds are blowing the other way. In October, the Oversight Board Trust announced the establishment of the Appeals Centre Europe, an independent dispute-resolution body that extends to YouTube and TikTok as well as Facebook. The body has been recognised under the Digital Services Act, which places general transparency and accountability obligations on very large platforms. In the absence of such legislation, it seems very unlikely that we will see genuinely independent and accountable decision-making from digital platforms that can resist changes in political winds. Australia would do well to take note.

Michael Davis profile picture

Michael Davis,

CMT Research Fellow

Share
Share this on Facebook Share this on Twitter Share this on LinkedIn
Back to CMT news

Acknowledgement of Country

UTS acknowledges the Gadigal People of the Eora Nation and the Boorooberongal People of the Dharug Nation upon whose ancestral lands our campuses now stand. We would also like to pay respect to the Elders both past and present, acknowledging them as the traditional custodians of knowledge for these lands. 

University of Technology Sydney

City Campus

15 Broadway, Ultimo, NSW 2007

Get in touch with UTS

Follow us

  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • Facebook

A member of

  • Australian Technology Network
Use arrow keys to navigate within each column of links. Press Tab to move between columns.

Study

  • Find a course
  • Undergraduate
  • Postgraduate
  • How to apply
  • Scholarships and prizes
  • International students
  • Campus maps
  • Accommodation

Engage

  • Find an expert
  • Industry
  • News
  • Events
  • Experience UTS
  • Research
  • Stories
  • Alumni

About

  • Who we are
  • Faculties
  • Learning and teaching
  • Sustainability
  • Initiatives
  • Equity, diversity and inclusion
  • Campus and locations
  • Awards and rankings
  • UTS governance

Staff and students

  • Current students
  • Help and support
  • Library
  • Policies
  • StaffConnect
  • Working at UTS
  • UTS Handbook
  • Contact us
  • Copyright © 2025
  • ABN: 77 257 686 961
  • CRICOS provider number: 00099F
  • TEQSA provider number: PRV12060
  • TEQSA category: Australian University
  • Privacy
  • Copyright
  • Disclaimer
  • Accessibility