Skip to main content

Site navigation

  • University of Technology Sydney home
  • Home

    Home
  • For students

  • For industry

  • Research

Explore

  • Courses
  • Events
  • News
  • Stories
  • People

For you

  • Libraryarrow_right_alt
  • Staffarrow_right_alt
  • Alumniarrow_right_alt
  • Current studentsarrow_right_alt
  • Study at UTS

    • arrow_right_alt Find a course
    • arrow_right_alt Course areas
    • arrow_right_alt Undergraduate students
    • arrow_right_alt Postgraduate students
    • arrow_right_alt Research Masters and PhD
    • arrow_right_alt Online study and short courses
  • Student information

    • arrow_right_alt Current students
    • arrow_right_alt New UTS students
    • arrow_right_alt Graduates (Alumni)
    • arrow_right_alt High school students
    • arrow_right_alt Indigenous students
    • arrow_right_alt International students
  • Admissions

    • arrow_right_alt How to apply
    • arrow_right_alt Entry pathways
    • arrow_right_alt Eligibility
arrow_right_altVisit our hub for students

For you

  • Libraryarrow_right_alt
  • Staffarrow_right_alt
  • Alumniarrow_right_alt
  • Current studentsarrow_right_alt

POPULAR LINKS

  • Apply for a coursearrow_right_alt
  • Current studentsarrow_right_alt
  • Scholarshipsarrow_right_alt
  • Featured industries

    • arrow_right_alt Agriculture and food
    • arrow_right_alt Defence and space
    • arrow_right_alt Energy and transport
    • arrow_right_alt Government and policy
    • arrow_right_alt Health and medical
    • arrow_right_alt Corporate training
  • Explore

    • arrow_right_alt Tech Central
    • arrow_right_alt Case studies
    • arrow_right_alt Research
arrow_right_altVisit our hub for industry

For you

  • Libraryarrow_right_alt
  • Staffarrow_right_alt
  • Alumniarrow_right_alt
  • Current studentsarrow_right_alt

POPULAR LINKS

  • Find a UTS expertarrow_right_alt
  • Partner with usarrow_right_alt
  • Explore

    • arrow_right_alt Explore our research
    • arrow_right_alt Research centres and institutes
    • arrow_right_alt Graduate research
    • arrow_right_alt Research partnerships
arrow_right_altVisit our hub for research

For you

  • Libraryarrow_right_alt
  • Staffarrow_right_alt
  • Alumniarrow_right_alt
  • Current studentsarrow_right_alt

POPULAR LINKS

  • Find a UTS expertarrow_right_alt
  • Research centres and institutesarrow_right_alt
  • University of Technology Sydney home
Explore the University of Technology Sydney
Category Filters:
University of Technology Sydney home University of Technology Sydney home
  1. home
  2. arrow_forward_ios ... Newsroom
  3. arrow_forward_ios ... 2024
  4. arrow_forward_ios 07
  5. arrow_forward_ios The disinformation dilemma

The disinformation dilemma

5 July 2024
A face looks out of submerged waves of banded light and colour

Since public consultation ended last August on the exposure draft of the combatting misinformation and disinformation bill, there have been few clues on what changes the government is thinking about  to address the  feedback. One clue came in April in the issues paper for the review of the Online Safety Act, which indicated there would be ‘new measures to improve protections for public debate, freedom of speech and religious expression, improve the transparency and accountability of platforms’ decision making, and improve public visibility into the efficacy of platform misinformation and disinformation strategies.’

Another clue came  last week in a submission from the Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development, Communications and the Arts to the ongoing inquiry  on Social Media and Australian Society. There, the department states that the bill ‘would not enable ACMA to request [that] specific content or posts be removed from digital platform services and includes strong protections for privacy and freedom of speech. For example, professional news content, online content related to satire, reasonable public debate (i.e. academic, scientific, religious or artistic), and private messages would be exempted entirely.’

This suggests the government has taken account of the free-speech concerns raised by the exposure draft – which in our view were not without foundation, if somewhat overblown – and that the limitations on ACMA’s powers will be clarified. And while the final form of the bill remains to be seen, it also suggests that ‘excluded content for misinformation purposes’ will be expanded to include ‘reasonable public debate’, as well as professional news, satire and private messaging.

These changes will no doubt be welcomed by many critics of the bill. But as we have previously argued, narrowing the scope of ACMA powers by excluding certain types of content also narrows the range of content for which platforms can be held accountable. The bill thus fails to acknowledge the imposition that platforms make on freedom of expression when they moderate user content. Excluding a certain class of content does not prevent platforms from moderating that content – it only limits ACMA’s powers to hold platforms accountable for how they engage in that moderation. Thus, ACMA will not have the power to request data about how many professional news items a platform has removed, or why. Nor will it be able to ensure that platforms provide news companies with that data, or with access to an appeal mechanism in the case that a news item is removed.

This is not idle speculation. YouTube’s removal of Sky News Australia videos under their Covid misinformation policy is an example of an action that would be excluded from the bill. Excluding it will not prevent YouTube from removing professional news videos in the future, but it will certainly mean they cannot be held accountable under the bill for doing so.

In this way, the bill undermines its own objectives by failing to hold platforms accountable for a wide range of content-moderation measures. This might seem like an unfortunate but inexorable dilemma. Surely it is more critical to limit government power over online speech than platform power. But, as we argued in our submission on the exposure draft, we can in fact do both; by explicitly limiting ACMA power to functional matters relating to ‘platform systems and processes’, there is no need to be unduly restrictive over the scope of content or services to which the bill, or an industry code, applies. This would provide increased accountability for platforms, while allaying concerns about government overreach.

Michael Davis

Michael Davis, CMT Co-Director

 

Share
Share this on Facebook Share this on Twitter Share this on LinkedIn
Back to CMT news

Acknowledgement of Country

UTS acknowledges the Gadigal People of the Eora Nation and the Boorooberongal People of the Dharug Nation upon whose ancestral lands our campuses now stand. We would also like to pay respect to the Elders both past and present, acknowledging them as the traditional custodians of knowledge for these lands. 

University of Technology Sydney

City Campus

15 Broadway, Ultimo, NSW 2007

Get in touch with UTS

Follow us

  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • Facebook

A member of

  • Australian Technology Network
Use arrow keys to navigate within each column of links. Press Tab to move between columns.

Study

  • Find a course
  • Undergraduate
  • Postgraduate
  • How to apply
  • Scholarships and prizes
  • International students
  • Campus maps
  • Accommodation

Engage

  • Find an expert
  • Industry
  • News
  • Events
  • Experience UTS
  • Research
  • Stories
  • Alumni

About

  • Who we are
  • Faculties
  • Learning and teaching
  • Sustainability
  • Initiatives
  • Equity, diversity and inclusion
  • Campus and locations
  • Awards and rankings
  • UTS governance

Staff and students

  • Current students
  • Help and support
  • Library
  • Policies
  • StaffConnect
  • Working at UTS
  • UTS Handbook
  • Contact us
  • Copyright © 2025
  • ABN: 77 257 686 961
  • CRICOS provider number: 00099F
  • TEQSA provider number: PRV12060
  • TEQSA category: Australian University
  • Privacy
  • Copyright
  • Disclaimer
  • Accessibility