Skip to main content

Site navigation

  • University of Technology Sydney home
  • Home

    Home
  • For students

  • For industry

  • Research

Explore

  • Courses
  • Events
  • News
  • Stories
  • People

For you

  • Libraryarrow_right_alt
  • Staffarrow_right_alt
  • Alumniarrow_right_alt
  • Current studentsarrow_right_alt
  • Study at UTS

    • arrow_right_alt Find a course
    • arrow_right_alt Course areas
    • arrow_right_alt Undergraduate students
    • arrow_right_alt Postgraduate students
    • arrow_right_alt Research Masters and PhD
    • arrow_right_alt Online study and short courses
  • Student information

    • arrow_right_alt Current students
    • arrow_right_alt New UTS students
    • arrow_right_alt Graduates (Alumni)
    • arrow_right_alt High school students
    • arrow_right_alt Indigenous students
    • arrow_right_alt International students
  • Admissions

    • arrow_right_alt How to apply
    • arrow_right_alt Entry pathways
    • arrow_right_alt Eligibility
arrow_right_altVisit our hub for students

For you

  • Libraryarrow_right_alt
  • Staffarrow_right_alt
  • Alumniarrow_right_alt
  • Current studentsarrow_right_alt

POPULAR LINKS

  • Apply for a coursearrow_right_alt
  • Current studentsarrow_right_alt
  • Scholarshipsarrow_right_alt
  • Featured industries

    • arrow_right_alt Agriculture and food
    • arrow_right_alt Defence and space
    • arrow_right_alt Energy and transport
    • arrow_right_alt Government and policy
    • arrow_right_alt Health and medical
    • arrow_right_alt Corporate training
  • Explore

    • arrow_right_alt Tech Central
    • arrow_right_alt Case studies
    • arrow_right_alt Research
arrow_right_altVisit our hub for industry

For you

  • Libraryarrow_right_alt
  • Staffarrow_right_alt
  • Alumniarrow_right_alt
  • Current studentsarrow_right_alt

POPULAR LINKS

  • Find a UTS expertarrow_right_alt
  • Partner with usarrow_right_alt
  • Explore

    • arrow_right_alt Explore our research
    • arrow_right_alt Research centres and institutes
    • arrow_right_alt Graduate research
    • arrow_right_alt Research partnerships
arrow_right_altVisit our hub for research

For you

  • Libraryarrow_right_alt
  • Staffarrow_right_alt
  • Alumniarrow_right_alt
  • Current studentsarrow_right_alt

POPULAR LINKS

  • Find a UTS expertarrow_right_alt
  • Research centres and institutesarrow_right_alt
  • University of Technology Sydney home
Explore the University of Technology Sydney
Category Filters:
University of Technology Sydney home University of Technology Sydney home
  1. home
  2. arrow_forward_ios ... Newsroom
  3. arrow_forward_ios ... 2024
  4. arrow_forward_ios 01
  5. arrow_forward_ios Only the hawks are unhappy as China relations stabilise

Only the hawks are unhappy as China relations stabilise

15 January 2024
Visit to the Temple of Heaven by Prime Minister Albanese and Minister Wong

DFAT


James Laurenceson

 

James Laurenceson, Director, Australia-China Relations Institute, University of Technology Sydney

Download

Note: This article appeared in The Australian Financial Review on January 15 2024.

Australia’s China hawks spent 2023 becoming increasingly frustrated by the Albanese government’s handling of relations with Beijing. By year’s end, the accusations and insults were flying freely.

But if the positive trajectory in Australia-China relations begun in May 2022 is to continue, then Canberra would do well to stay the course. And it can do so confidently: the hawks might be noisy, but the Australian public remain unpersuaded by their lobbying.

One common hawk criticism is that by having a goal of ‘stabilising’ the relationship, the government has become hung up on mere ‘atmospherics’. In doing so, Canberra has fallen into a ‘foreign policy trap’ laid by Beijing and become reluctant to ‘call out’ Chinese bad behaviour.

Another is that the Albanese government is pulling its policy punches. For example, there’s the claim that by offering a negotiated settlement to trade disputes involving barley and wine, rather than forcing Beijing to face a public shaming in the form of an adverse ruling at the World Trade Organisation (WTO), Canberra missed a chance to deter Chinese economic coercion and defend the international rules-based order.

Foreign Minister Penny Wong’s overarching foreign policy goal of seeking a ‘strategic equilibrium’ in a multipolar region is dismissed as ‘naive and fuzzy thinking’. The argument goes that what’s needed instead is for Australia to unequivocally back the US in strategic competition and take China on.

Sure, it’s begrudgingly acknowledged that under the Albanese government’s watch, trade restrictions have mostly been removed, and Australians detained in China like Cheng Lei are now back home.

But, according to the hawks, such foreign policy ‘wins’ don’t owe to Labor’s superior diplomatic approach. Rather, Beijing simply came to understand that its previous hardline tactics weren’t working and so reversed course.

All these claims and assessments strain credibility.

If the goal of ‘stabilisation’ is misguided, it’s curious that senior Biden administration officials have taken to increasingly emphasising it.

Cynics might write off the smiling photo ops that accompany leaders and ministerial-level meetings as mere ‘atmospherics’. But the serious discussions that follow have seen Joe Biden himself declare that, ‘there is no substitute to face-to-face discussions’ with China’s political leaders.

And words matter. Recall that before the bilateral relationship went into freefall in May 2020, Canberra made plenty of policy choices that upset Beijing, such as banning Chinese technology company Huawei from participating in Australia’s 5G rollout. Yet, it was only after Scott Morrison began aping Donald Trump’s rhetorical attacks on Beijing over the COVID-19 pandemic that Australian exports began being disrupted.

There’s no doubt that by the end of 2021 Beijing realised that its trade attacks were proving ineffective in shifting Canberra’s political positions. But it doesn’t follow that if the Morrison government were returned and doubled-down on megaphone diplomacy that Australian exporters would have seen their market access restored nonetheless.

The idea that offering Beijing a face-saving off-ramp only encourages Chinese economic coercion fails to understand the concept of deterrence. This involves making threats to prevent something from happening.

What reason is there to think that China would find having to face a formal WTO ruling now so alarming as to change its calculus the next time it contemplates disrupting trade for geopolitical ends? After all, a barrage of adverse WTO rulings has not deterred the US, the world’s other great power, from continuing to break international trade rules.

Meanwhile, Wong’s vision for the region order is firmly aligned with countries in South-east Asia, that vast expanse of geography between Australia and China. No country wants to be dominated by China. But there is next to no desire to preserve US primacy by lining up to support China’s containment. Rather, the consensus is that further improvements in Chinese living standards and integrating it into the broader regional economy is desirable for both prosperity and security.

The Australian public are firmly behind the change in approach the Albanese government has championed.

That the Morrison government’s hyping of the China threat for domestic political purposes backfired at the ballot box has been confirmed by the Liberal Party’s own post-election review. This concluded that being more sensitive to Australia’s Chinese community and rebuilding the party’s relationship with it must be a priority of the Peter Dutton-led opposition.

Polling by the Australia-China Relations Institute also shows that Labor now holds a clear 20 percentage point lead over the Coalition as the party ‘best placed to handle Australia’s China policy’.

That’s likely because, unlike the hawks, the Australian public hold nuanced and pragmatic views. On the one hand, 67 percent express concern and apprehension about relations with China. On the other, nearly the same percentage support trying to build closer ties with China, not least of all because the economic benefits from doing so are widely appreciated.

And according to a poll last month by The Australian Financial Review, of 10 parameters tested, the public gave the Albanese government a net positive rating in 2023 in only one: improving ‘Australia’s relations with China’.

There’s plenty of areas where the government might benefit from changing tack in 2024. China policy isn’t one of them.


Author

Professor James Laurenceson is Director of the Australia-China Relations Institute at the University of Technology Sydney.

Share
Share this on Facebook Share this on Twitter Share this on LinkedIn
Back to Commentary

Acknowledgement of Country

UTS acknowledges the Gadigal People of the Eora Nation and the Boorooberongal People of the Dharug Nation upon whose ancestral lands our campuses now stand. We would also like to pay respect to the Elders both past and present, acknowledging them as the traditional custodians of knowledge for these lands. 

University of Technology Sydney

City Campus

15 Broadway, Ultimo, NSW 2007

Get in touch with UTS

Follow us

  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • Facebook

A member of

  • Australian Technology Network
Use arrow keys to navigate within each column of links. Press Tab to move between columns.

Study

  • Find a course
  • Undergraduate
  • Postgraduate
  • How to apply
  • Scholarships and prizes
  • International students
  • Campus maps
  • Accommodation

Engage

  • Find an expert
  • Industry
  • News
  • Events
  • Experience UTS
  • Research
  • Stories
  • Alumni

About

  • Who we are
  • Faculties
  • Learning and teaching
  • Sustainability
  • Initiatives
  • Equity, diversity and inclusion
  • Campus and locations
  • Awards and rankings
  • UTS governance

Staff and students

  • Current students
  • Help and support
  • Library
  • Policies
  • StaffConnect
  • Working at UTS
  • UTS Handbook
  • Contact us
  • Copyright © 2025
  • ABN: 77 257 686 961
  • CRICOS provider number: 00099F
  • TEQSA provider number: PRV12060
  • TEQSA category: Australian University
  • Privacy
  • Copyright
  • Disclaimer
  • Accessibility