Skip to main content

Site navigation

  • University of Technology Sydney home
  • Home

    Home
  • For students

  • For industry

  • Research

Explore

  • Courses
  • Events
  • News
  • Stories
  • People

For you

  • Libraryarrow_right_alt
  • Staffarrow_right_alt
  • Alumniarrow_right_alt
  • Current studentsarrow_right_alt
  • Study at UTS

    • arrow_right_alt Find a course
    • arrow_right_alt Course areas
    • arrow_right_alt Undergraduate students
    • arrow_right_alt Postgraduate students
    • arrow_right_alt Research Masters and PhD
    • arrow_right_alt Online study and short courses
  • Student information

    • arrow_right_alt Current students
    • arrow_right_alt New UTS students
    • arrow_right_alt Graduates (Alumni)
    • arrow_right_alt High school students
    • arrow_right_alt Indigenous students
    • arrow_right_alt International students
  • Admissions

    • arrow_right_alt How to apply
    • arrow_right_alt Entry pathways
    • arrow_right_alt Eligibility
arrow_right_altVisit our hub for students

For you

  • Libraryarrow_right_alt
  • Staffarrow_right_alt
  • Alumniarrow_right_alt
  • Current studentsarrow_right_alt

POPULAR LINKS

  • Apply for a coursearrow_right_alt
  • Current studentsarrow_right_alt
  • Scholarshipsarrow_right_alt
  • Featured industries

    • arrow_right_alt Agriculture and food
    • arrow_right_alt Defence and space
    • arrow_right_alt Energy and transport
    • arrow_right_alt Government and policy
    • arrow_right_alt Health and medical
    • arrow_right_alt Corporate training
  • Explore

    • arrow_right_alt Tech Central
    • arrow_right_alt Case studies
    • arrow_right_alt Research
arrow_right_altVisit our hub for industry

For you

  • Libraryarrow_right_alt
  • Staffarrow_right_alt
  • Alumniarrow_right_alt
  • Current studentsarrow_right_alt

POPULAR LINKS

  • Find a UTS expertarrow_right_alt
  • Partner with usarrow_right_alt
  • Explore

    • arrow_right_alt Explore our research
    • arrow_right_alt Research centres and institutes
    • arrow_right_alt Graduate research
    • arrow_right_alt Research partnerships
arrow_right_altVisit our hub for research

For you

  • Libraryarrow_right_alt
  • Staffarrow_right_alt
  • Alumniarrow_right_alt
  • Current studentsarrow_right_alt

POPULAR LINKS

  • Find a UTS expertarrow_right_alt
  • Research centres and institutesarrow_right_alt
  • University of Technology Sydney home
Explore the University of Technology Sydney
Category Filters:
University of Technology Sydney home University of Technology Sydney home
  1. home
  2. arrow_forward_ios ... Newsroom
  3. arrow_forward_ios ... 2022
  4. arrow_forward_ios 08
  5. arrow_forward_ios Cool heads needed to avoid escalating tension

Cool heads needed to avoid escalating tension

12 August 2022

Blablo101 / Shutterstock


James Laurenceson

 

James Laurenceson, Director, Australia-China Relations Institute, University of Technology Sydney

Download

This article appeared in China Daily on August 12 2022. 

In the aftermath of the visit to Taiwan by US House of Representatives Speaker Nancy Pelosi, the Australia-China relationship is once again inflamed.

This follows a modest thawing in bilateral ties after the new government, led by Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, took office in Canberra in May.

The temptation on both sides will be to interpret fast-unfolding events through the same sweeping frames applied in recent years. For Beijing, this means seeing Canberra as nothing more than a lapdog of Washington.

For Canberra, it means pigeon-holing Beijing as an irresponsible regional actor that is prone to over-reaction and using coercive measures to get its way.

But a careful study of the timeline would go a good way to prompting both sides to pause and reassess. The alternative is a destructive, escalatory spiral that is fuelled by misunderstanding, fear and indignation.

Pelosi touched down in Taipei late at night local time on August 2. The immediate response of Australia’s foreign minister, Penny Wong, was to hit breakfast talkback radio to urge ‘all parties’ to de-escalate tensions, reiterate Australia’s one-China policy and discourage ‘unilateral changes to the status quo’. The party most obviously disrupting the status quo was the US.

Wong also declined to endorse Pelosi’s visit, saying only that ‘the level of US engagement with their Taiwanese counterparts is a matter for them’. Beijing surely could not have wished for more.

Here was Australia sounding more like Indonesia or India; the shift in tone compared to the former Scott Morrison government was stark.

That evening Wong flew to Cambodia for two days of ASEAN-led meetings.

On August 4 she used a doorstop in Phnom Penh to repeat the same messages from a day earlier, also drawing attention to a just-released statement by ASEAN foreign ministers that had expressed ‘similar views’. That statement, too, had used the language of ‘all parties’.

The New York Times judged Wong’s insistent formulation newsworthy, presumably because rather than being full-throated in support of its security ally, the Australian foreign minister had ‘appeared to signal that China and the United States should calm things down’.

The US Secretary of State, Antony Blinken, meanwhile, was busy issuing a statement with G7 foreign ministers that homed in on China for criticism.

But late in the afternoon on August 4, China started firing off ballistic missiles into the waters around Taiwan, as well as into Japan’s claimed Exclusive Economic Zone.

It was only then that Wong changed course, issuing on August 5 a media release that described China’s actions as ‘disproportionate and destabilising’.

On August 6, following a trilateral strategic dialogue involving Australia, the US and Japan, a ministerial-level meeting first instituted in 2005, Wong joined with Secretary Blinken and Japanese Foreign Minister Hayashi Yoshimasa to condemn the missile launches and urge China to cease military exercises.

But even then, unlike the G7 statement, there was no reference to the Washington talking point that Pelosi’s visit was ‘normal and routine’. It is not too much of a stretch to imagine that Wong might have resisted its inclusion.

This week, Australia’s defence minister, Richard Marles, again declined to endorse Pelosi’s trip.

In short, if Beijing was paying close attention, it would find compelling evidence that the Australian government has simply been responding to the Chinese actions.

Of course, Beijing may still reject Canberra’s assessment that its actions were ‘disproportionate’, and protest accordingly.

But the facts do not support a lazy interpretation that Canberra is blindly following Washington.

There are lessons from the timeline for Canberra too.

My own conversation with a Chinese diplomat in the afternoon of August 3, when Pelosi was still in Taiwan, displayed a cognizance that the Australian government’s initial response had been restrained.

And on the evening of August 5, remarks by the Chinese embassy responding to Wong’s media release a few hours earlier were a mile away from a ‘wolf warrior’ attack, heaping blame on the US but, in regard to Canberra, only saying that ‘we hope the Australian side could get a clear understanding of the cause and nature of the current crisis…’.

It was after the joint Australia-US-Japan statement on August 6 that the embassy deployed much stronger language, alleging that in singling China out for criticism but not the US, ‘the Australian side has condemned the victim along with the perpetrators’.

Beyond criticizing live-fire responses, extending some strategic empathy to Beijing should not be beyond Canberra’s capacity.

Even US commentators concede that under the Trump and Biden administrations Washington has steadily been making its commitment to a one-China policy, the political foundation of US-China relations, ever more elastic.

In October last year, China’s Foreign Minister Wang Yi called on the US to pursue a ‘real one-China policy’, not a ‘fake’ one.

And that Japan’s ugly history of forcing China’s imperial Qing Dynasty government to cede Taiwan in 1895, and colonizing it until 1945 is matter of historical record.

It is not too late for cool heads in Canberra and Beijing to prevail.


Author

Professor James Laurenceson is Director of the Australia-China Relations Institute at the University of Technology Sydney.

Share
Share this on Facebook Share this on Twitter Share this on LinkedIn
Back to Commentary

Acknowledgement of Country

UTS acknowledges the Gadigal People of the Eora Nation and the Boorooberongal People of the Dharug Nation upon whose ancestral lands our campuses now stand. We would also like to pay respect to the Elders both past and present, acknowledging them as the traditional custodians of knowledge for these lands. 

University of Technology Sydney

City Campus

15 Broadway, Ultimo, NSW 2007

Get in touch with UTS

Follow us

  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • Facebook

A member of

  • Australian Technology Network
Use arrow keys to navigate within each column of links. Press Tab to move between columns.

Study

  • Find a course
  • Undergraduate
  • Postgraduate
  • How to apply
  • Scholarships and prizes
  • International students
  • Campus maps
  • Accommodation

Engage

  • Find an expert
  • Industry
  • News
  • Events
  • Experience UTS
  • Research
  • Stories
  • Alumni

About

  • Who we are
  • Faculties
  • Learning and teaching
  • Sustainability
  • Initiatives
  • Equity, diversity and inclusion
  • Campus and locations
  • Awards and rankings
  • UTS governance

Staff and students

  • Current students
  • Help and support
  • Library
  • Policies
  • StaffConnect
  • Working at UTS
  • UTS Handbook
  • Contact us
  • Copyright © 2025
  • ABN: 77 257 686 961
  • CRICOS provider number: 00099F
  • TEQSA provider number: PRV12060
  • TEQSA category: Australian University
  • Privacy
  • Copyright
  • Disclaimer
  • Accessibility