- Posted on 31 Aug 2020
- 3-minute read
The interests and rights of disabled children must come first in any decisions affecting their lives and long-term care.
Parents and carers of disabled children are often daunted by the thought of what will happen when their child grows and matures.
There are many cases where families seek to medically manage this process. One example is the US case of Ashley X. Ashley was a profoundly disabled six-year-old child when her parents and doctors successfully argued before an ethics committee that the family would not be able to look after her as she developed into adulthood.
Doctors performed a hysterectomy and mastectomy and administered high levels of oestrogen to stunt her growth.
UTS Law Professor Michael Thomson’s latest co-authored research focuses on Ashley X and what has become known as the Ashley treatment. He says the idea that this intervention is acceptable to make care easier is deeply problematic:
Disabled children and adults are the subject of decisions which in other contexts would undoubtedly be deemed abusive and legally impermissible. It is difficult to identify another scenario in which law or medical ethics would sanction such radical interventions.
Professor Thomson’s work focuses on the principle of ‘bodily integrity’ which is a core value across a number of different areas of law, "It means the right of each person, including children to autonomy and self-determination over their own body. Under this principle, physical intrusion without consent is a violation of human rights."
The research makes a strong argument for the concept to be expanded and strengthened to one of ‘embodied integrity’; accepting the importance of lived experience and the right of children to self-determination in later life.
Professor Thomson says that non-therapeutic actions that limit the options a child should have when they reach adulthood should not be permitted:
“The child’s right to embodied integrity must be the starting point for best interest assessments ... In order to counter the construction of disabled people as objects… it is necessary to prioritise the child’s interests in this way.”
He argues that at the same time we respect the rights of disabled children it is essential we better support those who care for disabled children and young people.
This is Law research in action
See where a Law research degree could take you.
Researcher
Professor, Faculty of Law
Quokka Quantum
The Rapido software and mechatronics team assisted academics Christopher Ferrie and Simon Devitt on the early prototype that paved the way to the first...
Navantia Australia
Collaboratively with Navantia Australia and Eye Candy Animation, we defined, designed and developed cutting-edge training solutions for the defence sector.
Informed 365
In an era where corporate social responsibility is at the forefront of consumer minds, the partnership between Informed 365 and UTS Rapido sets a new standard...
Victorian Energy Workforce Projections
The study includes projections for the electricity sector (generation and storage, transmission line construction), an estimate of the overall energy...
Quokka Quantum
The Rapido software and mechatronics team assisted academics Christopher Ferrie and Simon Devitt on the early prototype that paved the way to the first...
Navantia Australia
Collaboratively with Navantia Australia and Eye Candy Animation, we defined, designed and developed cutting-edge training solutions for the defence sector.
Informed 365
In an era where corporate social responsibility is at the forefront of consumer minds, the partnership between Informed 365 and UTS Rapido sets a new standard...
Victorian Energy Workforce Projections
The study includes projections for the electricity sector (generation and storage, transmission line construction), an estimate of the overall energy...