• Posted on 13 Dec 2017
  • 7-minute read
800x450%2020171123_Foreign_Policy_White_Paper_Release-6875
Simone van Nieuwenhuizen

Simone van Nieuwenhuizen, Project and Research Officer, Australia-China Relations Institute, University of Technology Sydney

Download

In July 2017 the Australia-China Relations Institute (ACRI) published the fact sheet ‘Australia’s tilt on China’, which details Australian government representatives’ statements on China and the Australia-China relationship in the first half of the year.[1]

Since this time, the messages sent on the bilateral relationship have been mixed.

Addressing the Asia Society in New York on September 22, Australian Foreign Minister Julie Bishop said:[2]

We support China playing a greater leadership role in reinforcing and strengthening the rules-based order that has enabled its rise and continues to underpin its growing prosperity.

Minister Bishop repeated this sentiment in a November 23 speech on the 45th anniversary of Australia’s diplomatic relations with the People’s Republic of China:[3]

I particularly want to acknowledge that with China's growing power and influence it has taken on a global role in supporting that international rules based order and I use the example of China's principled stand in supporting and defending the United Nations Security Council in upholding its authority in relation to the egregious behaviour of North Korea.

I particularly want to acknowledge that with China's growing power and influence it has taken on a global role in supporting that international rules based order and I use the example of China's principled stand in supporting and defending the United Nations Security Council in upholding its authority in relation to the egregious behaviour of North Korea.

In her Confucius Institute Annual Lecture at the University of Adelaide on October 7, Secretary of the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade, Frances Adamson said:[4]

Nonetheless, we are brought together by geography and shared interests today in ways that could not have been imagined 200 years ago. It is incumbent on us, today, to make sure the relationship is developed with an eye to more than simple convenience.

Nonetheless, we are brought together by geography and shared interests today in ways that could not have been imagined 200 years ago. It is incumbent on us, today, to make sure the relationship is developed with an eye to more than simple convenience.

Nonetheless, we are brought together by geography and shared interests today in ways that could not have been imagined 200 years ago. It is incumbent on us, today, to make sure the relationship is developed with an eye to more than simple convenience.

In a speech at Deakin University on November 17 Minister Bishop stated:[5]

However, China is only one of several significant powers in our region.

However, China is only one of several significant powers in our region.

However, China is only one of several significant powers in our region.

However, China is only one of several significant powers in our region.

However, China is only one of several significant powers in our region.

Page one of the Australian government’s Foreign Policy White Paper, launched on November 23, states:[6]

In the Indo-Pacific, the economic growth that has come with globalisation is in turn changing power balances. The United States has been the dominant power in our region throughout Australias post-World War II history. Today, China is challenging Americas position.

At the same time, page four of the paper notes:[7]

The Government is committed to strong and constructive ties with China. We welcome Chinas greater capacity to share responsibility for supporting regional and global security. We seek to strengthen our Comprehensive Strategic Partnership for the benefit of both nations.

In his speech launching Australia’s Foreign Policy White Paper, Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull stated:[8]

This is the first time in our history that our dominant trading partner is not also our dominant security partner. We must see this as an opportunity not as a risk.

During the press conference following the White Paper’s launch, Prime Minister Turnbull emphasised the importance of Australia’s trade relationship with China, and the Australian Chinese community:[9]

We could not imagine modern Australia without a million or more Australians of Chinese ancestry.

We could not imagine modern Australia without a million or more Australians of Chinese ancestry.

(For a full account of the White Paper, see ACRI fact sheet ‘China in Australia’s Foreign Policy White Paper’, November 23 2017).[10]

Comments such as these have tended to be overshadowed by reporting of government announcements on political donations and foreign influence.

On December 5 the Australian government announced legislative reforms targeting foreign interference and espionage. The media release stated:[11]

The Government will introduce the most comprehensive foreign donations ban ever considered by an Australian Government.

The Government will introduce the most comprehensive foreign donations ban ever considered by an Australian Government.

In a statement to the press on the legislative reforms, Prime Minister Turnbull said:[12]

We have recently seen disturbing reports about Chinese influence. I take those reports, as do my colleagues, very seriously. But these reforms are not about any one country. Foreign interference is a global issue.

In the Australian House of Representatives on December 7 Prime Minister Turnbull stated:[13]

Our relationship with China is far too important to put at risk by failing to clearly set the terms of healthy and sustainable engagement. Modern China was founded by the statement that Chinese people have stood up. And today, and every day, the Australian people stand up and assert their sovereignty in our nation, with our parliament and with our laws.

On December 9 Prime Minister Turnbull repeated this statement to journalists on the sidelines of his campaign in Bennelong.[14]

In a panel discussion at the Australian National University on December 8, Australia’s Ambassador to the United States, Joe Hockey reportedly said that Chinese interference threatens the democratic values Australians have 'fought and died for':[15]

You cant let democracy be run or influenced by other countries.

You cant let democracy be run or influenced by other countries.

Endnotes

[1] Elena Collinson, ‘Australia’s tilt on China’, Australia-China Relations Institute fact sheet, July 4 2017 <>http://www.australiachinarelations.org/content/australias-tilt-china>.

[2] Julie Bishop, ‘Address to the Asia Society’, speech transcript, September 22 2017 < https://foreignminister.gov.au/speeches/Pages/2017/jb_sp_170922a.aspx>.

[3] Julie Bishop, ‘45th Anniversary of Australia-China Diplomatic Relations’, speech transcript, Melbourne, November 23 2017 <>https://foreignminister.gov.au/speeches/Pages/2017/jb_sp_171123.aspx?w=tb1CaGpkPX%2FlS0K%2Bg9ZKEg%3D%3D>.

[4] Frances Adamson, ‘Confucius Institute Annual Lecture: Australia and China in the 21st Century’, speech transcript, October 7 2017 .

[5] Julie Bishop, ‘2017 Alfred Deakin Institute oration’, speech transcript, November 17 2017 .

[6] Australian Government, 2017 Foreign Policy White Paper, p 1 <>https://www.fpwhitepaper.gov.au/foreign-policy-white-paper>.

[7] Ibid., p. 4.

[8] Phillip Coorey, ‘Foreign policy white paper: Australia’s US, China challenge hasn’t changed’, Australian Financial Review, November 23 2017 .

[9] Malcolm Turnbull, ‘Press conference at the launch of the Government’s Foreign Policy White Paper’, transcript, Foreign Minister of Australia, November 23 2017 .

[10] Elena Collinson, ‘China in Australia’s Foreign Policy White Paper’, Australia-China Relations Institute fact sheet, November 23 2017 .

[11] Prime Minister, Attorney-General, and Minister for Finance, ‘Protecting Australia from foreign interference’, media release, December 5 2017 .

[12] Prime Minister of Australia, ‘Press Conference with Senator the Hon. George Brandis QC, Attorney-General and Senator the Hon. Mathias Cormann, Minister for Finance’, transcript, December 5 2017 <>https://www.pm.gov.au/media/press-conference-senator-hon-george-brandis-qc-attorney-general-and-senator-hon-mathias>.

[13] Malcolm Turnbull, House of Representatives, ‘National Security Legislation Amendment (Espionage and Foreign Interference) Bill 2017 - Second Reading’, Hansard, December 7 2017 <>https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Hansard/Hansard_Display?bid=chamber/hansardr/716f5e71-dee3-40a3-9385-653e048de81b/&sid=0192>.

[14] Sky News, ‘PM confirms foreign political interference’, Sky News, December 9 2017 <>http://www.skynews.com.au/news/top-stories/2017/12/09/political-candidates--china-ties-revealed.html>.

[15] Rosie Lewis, ‘Joe Hockey’s stark warning to Australia over Chinese interference’, The Australian, December 9 2017 <>http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/joe-hockeys-stark-warning-to-australia-over-chinese-interference/news-story/0131a56a27a6ce8658aa065e805c8947>.

Author

Simone van Nieuwenhuizen is Project and Research Officer at the Australia-China Relations Institute at the University of Technology Sydney.

Share