Derek joined UTS as a Visiting Fellow in August 2014 and is now Co-Director of the Centre for Media Transition. CMT is an interdisciplinary initiative of the Faculty of Law and the Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, launched in July 2017.
Derek came to UTS from an industry-based position as Executive Director of the Australian Press Council. He worked closely on the Council’s responses to the Independent Media Inquiry and the Convergence Review and on the adaptation of the Council’s structure and governance to embrace smaller, digital-only publishers. As Executive Director, he led the Council’s complaints-handling functions and worked with the Chair and members on a review of the Council’s standards of practice.
Before this, he worked for the Australian Communications and Media Authority where he managed the implementation of the federal government’s media ownership reform package and the resulting commercial transactions. He also managed the ACMA’s monitoring and compliance activities on disclosures rules for commercial radio, as well as other content rules such as the anti-siphoning sports list, pay TV drama expenditure and the anti-terrorism standards for narrowcast television.
Derek finished his time at the ACMA by managing an operational policy team dedicated to complex regulatory problems spanning the legal and engineering spheres, including the transition to digital television.
From 2000 to 2005 Derek was the Director of the Communications Law Centre at UNSW. He taught media and communications regulation, conducted research and led the Centre’s policy work on issues such as media diversity, cash for comment and telecommunications consumer protection. He has also worked for the Office of Film and Literature Classification and the Media, Entertainment and Arts Alliance.
Can supervise: YES
- News media, diversity and plurality
- Convergence and media transition
- Structural and content regulation
- Media freedoms, privileges and responsibilities
- Regulation of the media
- Communications law and regulation
Reform of Australia's media ownership rules has been under discussion for several years, with at least some aspects supported by the previous Labor governments as well as by the Turnbull Liberal government.
Wilding, D 2015, 'The Summer 30 Royal Prank Call: Outcomes for Australian Broadcasting Regulation', The Journal of Media Law, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 92-107.View/Download from: UTS OPUS or Publisher's site
The prank call in 2012 by two Sydney radio presenters who tried to speak to the Duchess of Cambridge was followed by the death of nurse Jacintha Saldanha. The prank prompted a long-running investigation by Australia's broadcasting regulator, the Australian Communications and Media Authority, into the decision to record and broadcast, without consent, conversations with Ms Saldanha and another nurse. In a unanimous decision, the High Court of Australia has held the ACMA did not require a prior decision of a court in order to find the licensee, Today FM, committed an offence under surveillances devices legislation. This has cleared the way for the ACMA to find Today FM breached a condition of its licence. With the investigation report now on the public record and the ACMA contemplating enforcement action, the matter reveals deficiencies in the industry-based codes of practice.
Wilding, D, Dwyer, T, Curtis, S & Wilson, H 2006, 'Too Soon: The Government's Media Ownership Proposals', Media International Australia, vol. 119, no. 1, pp. 38-47.
In response to Minister Helen Coonan's discussion paper on media reform released in March, the authors survey the recent history of media ownership policy with particular reference to the Productivity Commission's visionary 2000 report on broadcasting. They argue that the present proposals fall short of the plan laid out in this report and are premature pending further development of digital media.
Wilding, D 2005, 'In the Shadow of the Pyramid: Consumers in communications self-regulation', Telecommunications Journal of Australia, vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 37-57.
The consumer driven communications (CDC) project focused attention on consumer participation in regulation. The project applied the concept of the regulatory pyramid to explore options for consumer participation at all levels of regulation. It explores ways of bringing consumers out from the shadow of the regulatory pyramid. There are good reasons advanced by legal theorists for why a self-regulatory scheme, correctly designed and operated, should be more efficient than direct intervention by the regulator.
Wilding, D 2003, 'The House, The Senate and the Media Ownership Bill: An 'Unacceptable Three-Way Control Situation?'', Media International Australia, vol. 108, no. 1, pp. 115-124.
Over the past year media ownership and control have been at the forefront of media policy debates in the United States and the United Kingdom. In Australia, the Media Ownership Bill was debated — and defeated in the Senate — in the last week of June. The Bill seeks to remove many of the regulations on ownership and control in the Australian media. It is expected to return to the Senate later this year and has been lipped as one of the handful of triggers for a double dissolution. In this article Derek Wilding provides an outline of the Bill following a number of recent amendments, as well as the key policy issues and points of contention in this long-running debate on diversity, convergence and media influence.
Wilding, D 2007, 'On Fair Terms: Public Participation in Communications Regulation in Australia' in Dwyer, T & Nightingale, V (eds), New Media Worlds: Challenges for Convergence, Oxford University Press, Melbourne, pp. 266-286.
Wilding, D, Atmore, C & Beal, E Communications Law Centre 2006, Not So Special: Telecommunications Contracts, Disability and Unfair Practices, Melbourne.
Wilding, D, Dwyer, T, Curtis, S & Wilson, H Communications Law Centre 2006, Content, Consolidation and Clout: How Will Regional Australia Be Affected by Medi Ownership Changes?, Sydney.
Wilding, D, Ang, I, Noble, G & Brand, J SBS 2002, Living Diversity: Australia's Multicultural Future, Sydney.
Wilding, D, McNiell, K & Casson, C Communications Law Centre 2002, One Size Fits None: Australian Telecommunications Household Profiles, Sydney.
Submission to Department of Communications and the Arts, November 2016 on review of funding for consumer representation grants.
Submission to Senate Select Committee
Submission to the Senate Environment and Communications Legislation Committee
Submission to the Australian Communications and Media Authority
Wilding, D 2016, 'The Briefcase: Does Australia's 'Most Exploitative Reality Show' Breach Broadcasting Rules?'.
Wilding, D 2016, 'The Scandal of 60 Minutes: No Broadcasting Standards, No Investigation'.
Submission to Department of Communications and the Arts